Thursday, September 23, 2021

Library Baby release "I Guess"

"I Guess" was released on Crying Cat Records on Sept. 17
Library Baby's sound has an air to it. It subtly drifts in and out on a gentle wind and that breeze just kind of washes over you as you listen. 

And so it is again on the group's latest single, "I Guess," another signature spare number placing Sarah Royal's fragile vocals out in front of Justin Lacy's atmospherics. Together, they weave this tapestry of sound that plays with space in the music in a way that many are not patient enough to. It has been argued that music itself is not the notes on the music sheet, but rather, the area in between those notes. Library Baby consistently works well with and in that space in their music. 

It was true in the early spring with the release of "How I Say My Name" as well. That song is driven by this swooning clarinet (or is it bassoon?) sound that makes a bit of a reprise cameo in "I Guess" but accompanied this time in a the song's climax by swirling strings and a kind of gypsy guitar sound that evokes Anton Karas's theme from The Third Man or almost any of the tunes from that Django Reinhardt/Stephane Grappelli collaboration in the late 40s. 

It is a nice touch. And "I Guess" adds to an already promising catalog from the Wilmington duo. 


--

For more, follow The Putnam Post on Instagram and Twitter.

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

REWIND: Autolux -- Future Perfect

Autolux released its debut, Future Perfect, in 2004
It's Greg Edwards' fault. 

The guy who penned the simultaneously mundane and quirky opening line, "Say hello to the rug's topography," to Failure's "The Nurse Who Loved Me" pulled me over to Autolux. In the time after the space rockers -- Failure hate that description -- called it quits in 1997, all I really wanted to soothe my soul was something that approximated or expanded on 1996's Fantastic Planet. [The group's masterpiece remains the criminally underappreciated.]

It is, of course, folly to wish for things that don't really need to be repeated or copied anyway. But in the absence of something like Fantastic Planet, I did what a lot of folks do: I followed the band members on to their next projects. 

Ken Andrews went on to do some solo stuff under the moniker, On (2000), and started Year of the Rabbit (2003). Those were both fun, but they did little to sate my desire for something else. Andrews also donned a producers hat, working on Blinker the Star's 1999 record, August Everywhere. And while I still have a soft spot in my heart for that album, Fantastic Planet (or Fantastic Planet-like) it is not. 

Neither is Autolux.

And that's entirely beside the point. Because in following Edwards to the LA trio and stumbling on their debut, Future Perfect (2004), I found something that not only filled that void but eclipsed it.1

Let's go track by track. Listen along (Spotify link above).

"Turnstile Blues"
Right out of the gate, Turnstile Blues is nothing remarkable until you consider that that lonesome drum beat up front is being powered by Carla Azar's bionic elbow. Bassist Eugene Goreshter enters with vocals and then at almost a minute in the distortion kicks in and starts to announce what Autolux is about: noise, noise, glorious noise.

"Angry Candy"
Angry Candy revs up to speed with a heavier fuzziness, but it is also a tune where we're first treated to another Autolux signature: the occasional vocal flourish. You can't call it doo wop, but -- and this factors in on later songs -- the band are hardly bashful about throwing in a doo do do (or whatever) not as filler but as part of the tapestry of any given song. [And for those of us who don't really hear lyrics until like the billionth listen, this sort of use of the vocal instrument can be a nice touch if done right. Autolux pull it off well.]

"Subzero Fun"
This is one you can feel from the get go is going to start in low, build the tension and then release it, kicking into overdrive. And it does. That opening line is a killer over that repeated, simple enough strum. ["You're my preferred route...  ...down."] Azar kicks it up a notch leaning on that bass drum. And then, bang, like a machine in some abandoned factory grinding to life, the chorus takes off. And that grind is the key.  

"Sugarless"
Cripes. What can you say about Sugarless? I've loved this one since the very first time I heard it. The formula isn't all that different from Turnstile, although there is a bit more complexity to the introductory part of the song. But then that drop -- oh, that drop -- hits a little more than a minute in. Exquisite. But the song is also the first to feature Azar on vocals (on the first part of the repeated chorus). This is something I can say in retrospect after years of listening, but songs with Azar on vocals are always good. Always. They are sporadic enough that they don't feel like the group are just doing that thing The Beatles did in giving Ringo "his" songs on an album. No, instead, Azar-sung songs are like a seal of approval, a guarantee that something good is coming down the pike. There's just a consistency to them over three records now. And to top it all off, there is that extended whirling dervish of an outro complete with vocal accoutrement (see Angry Candy) to close the song. It's one of those sequences you listen to on the recording and think to yourself, "That would be cool live." It is.

"Blanket"
Some track had to follow Sugarless and Blanket does yeoman's work in trying to keep up the pace of that scorcher. It's those reverby bits on the guitar in the chorus that carry the load. It is one of those things that makes you wonder whether something is wrong with your equipment. Is the speaker blown? What's wrong. Music that gives you that feint can be really rewarding. Well, to some of us anyway. 

"Great Days for the Passenger Element"
Not that the album moves at breakneck speed to this point, but Autolux downshift into first gear on Great Days. It is a change of pace, yes, and fair or not, it works in essence like the segues Failure has peppered its albums with since Fantastic Planet. It is a palate cleanser. But the distorted conclusion does in some ways foreshadow the band's use of darker bass on 2016's Pussy's Dead. [It wasn't all Boots.]

"Robots in the Garden"
Ah, here's that warped machine whirring back into form again. Robots is a buzzsaw that is nearly over before it starts, a quick number that packs all the fuzz, reverb and other distortions that one might crave.

"Here Comes Everybody"
But then the pace drops off again. Part of returning to that crescendoing song structure is that an album in which it is used can feel like a bit of a rollercoaster. Throughout Future Perfect, Autolux use that with aplomb. And hey, this song replaces those doo do dos with sha la las. And yeah, Azar is delivering them. So, check. This one is good too. "Here comes everybody you never cared... ...for... ...sha la la!" That line sends the song off in a fiery jam that feeds into the warbled keys over deep pulses that transition into another Azar turn on vocals in...

"Asleep at the Trigger"
Sure, Asleep at the Trigger slows things down again, but it is a gauzier song that is great in its use of space. It's a patient track with a melancholic overtone that you can fall for every time. And, my god, that ambling ending is like lava slowly working its way down the gentle slope of a volcano that long ago blew its top and has incrementally built its way part of the way back up. 

"Plantlife"
The fade out on Asleep meets the fade in of Plantlife. But what comes in alongside some spacey bleeps and bloops is something with a little bit more urgency. Unmistakably, however, it is that formula again: slow and low, building to something, this time through calls of "we're so dumb" and later exhortations of "shut your mouth". Plantlife never reaches the same peaks as some of the other preceding songs, but it isn't supposed to. It's purpose is to set up the closer, part of a progression over the final three songs.

"Capital Kind of Strain"
Finally, Capital is a slow build, brick by brick over the first more than three and a half minutes. Everything -- vocals, drums, guitar, bass -- is like the rhythm section of a jazz combo: repeating, dutifully keeping time behind some improvisation. But here, it is some spacey synth stuff deftly meandering around all the other component parts keeping time. And then, just as it seems as if the song will fade away and the record come to a close, it all comes rushing back, louder and more insistent with contorted guitars groaning in the background. This is one to listen to through headphones because things drift off almost into oblivion and then pop right back up again. But it is a brief fever dream that loses momentum and fades out.


--
So yeah, Future Perfect is pretty great. It is a benchmark by which I measure other records, not just those by Autolux. It isn't my favorite album. I don't play the favorite game because I think I'm probably still in search of it. But Future Perfect is very high up on my list. And it certainly is the bedrock of the sorts of snaps and farts I look for in (and view as good) music.


-- 
1 Yes, 2001's Demostration EP predates Future Perfect, but I didn't get to that material until after Future Perfect had already gotten its claws into me. 


--

For more, follow The Putnam Post on Instagram and Twitter.

If the Descent is only Decent, then Happy Pill's debut rocks by comparison

Decent Descent from Happy Pill came out on August 8
[Come for the dad joke headlines, stay for the scintillating analysis <wink>]

Pandemic time is weird. There is an elasticity to it that makes some things that happened not all that long ago feel like they did. Wilmington, NC band, Happy Pill, is a good example of that. I feel like they popped onto my radar on Instagram near the before times during the beginning stages of the lockdown in 2020. Well, I got the time of year right, but the year wrong. Local music Instagram was aflutter with mentions of the five piece in the spring of 2021, and then it wasn't (at least in my corner of the world). 

As it does, life happens. Umpteen new records came out, other stuff got heaped on my plate, and I lost track. I lost track, that is, until recently when, lo and behold, social media brought mention of Happy Pill back onto my screen.

Hey! What are those guys up to? They put a record out!?! [Immediately adds album to listening queue.]

I'd be kicking myself for missing five weeks of listening to Decent Descent, the group's debut, if I wasn't having such a good time listening to it right now in the present tense. At a time when most albums clock in at anywhere from half an hour to 45 minutes, Happy Pill turn in a true long player with 14 songs running nearly an hour in change. And it is an eclectic blend. 

Off the top, "Stayin' Home" hits like early Sneaks when it was just Eva Moolchan, a bass and a drum machine. That leads into "Describe the Light," which sounds like 70s era singer/songwriter stuff until the keys really come in and bring a loungy feel -- in a good way! -- with it. Then there is a series of tunes -- "Crossed My Mind," "Turn Your Back," and "Believe in Urself" -- that carry a kind of John Mayer vibe. I'm no fan of Mayer. He continues to strike me as a bit smarmy. [Sorry, not sorry.] But you can't deny his musicianship. He's got chops. And that set of songs from Happy Pill is all the solid musicianship without the smarminess. And then there's "Thinkin' Bout Food." It's a hell of an earworm, but I couldn't shake thinking about how "Yesterday" started out with Paul McCartney on a guitar singing "scrambled eggs" as filler until the words we all know came along. This song may or may not see another life, but in the meantime, we're left with a super catchy tune.

But where Happy Pill (unsurprisingly) grabs me is when they veer off in a 90s post-hardcore, tangentially shoegazey direction on songs like "See Thru" and "Anyone Who Loves Me." And look folks, don't get me started on "In This Moment." I'll push the elderly and children aside like George Costanza fleeing a "fire" to be first in line to listen to that one. [Editor's note: No, I wouldn't, but I do really dig that song.] That moment where Julia Rothenberg's delicate vocals are juxtaposed with a surging tidal wave of sound leading into the second verse is just beautiful. It's card that, when it's played well, gets me every time. Here, that card is played well.

Some may look at the ground covered on Decent Descent and say that Happy Pill are kind of all over the place on their first record. Poppycock. This is band that is not that long in the tooth and has seen some turnover in that short tenure. But they show a hell of a lot of potential. Hell, I'm more than happy to sit back and watch (and listen!) as they develop their voice. No rush, y'all, but I'm looking forward to what's next. And we've got more than enough to tide us over until then.


--

For more, follow The Putnam Post on Instagram and Twitter.

Low has another winner in HEY WHAT

Low's HEY WHAT was released September 10 on Sub Pop

No one likely needs an introduction to Duluth, Minnesota band, Low. The three piece has been at it a while, churning out spare, what-you-see-is-what-you-get rock for nearly three decades. Yet, my path did not cross theirs — well, their music’s — until 2005’s sunny The Great Destroyer (Sub Pop), a happenstance discovery via probably All Songs Considered or some magazine. [I know. How quaint.] 


Subsequent music from the trio drifted in and out of my life until 2018 when Low released Double Negative (Sub Pop). At the time, the record was hailed as, if not a departure from, then an evolution to the formula the band had tended to use to that point in their career. Fine, that was enough to get me to give it a whirl. 


First impression? Not good. And folks, I’m just about as tolerant a music listener as you will find. I can feel guilty for not liking some records that I feel like I should like based on some history with the band or whatever. But Double Negative did not do it for me. 


However, that said more about me than it did about the album. Because I wasn’t done with Double Negative and its warped and crumpled contours. I trekked out to the beach one weekend, pressed play and started walking. As the landscape became more desolate, Mimi Parker’s and Alan Sparhawk’s warbled harmonies fronting crackling distortions began to make much more sense to me. It all clicked. And there’s a lesson in there. There’s this commingling of time and place and mood with music when they cross paths and dance, however fleetingly, that never ceases to surprise and is almost always among the most beautiful of things. 


So, when HEY WHAT (Sub Pop) was released recently, I was better prepared. I was in a better headspace before I tackled it. And it is a fantastic extension of the tracks Low laid down on Double Negative. Those vocal harmonies may not be the prettiest out there, but there is this quality about them — and this is nothing new — that makes them feel like home. Over (or hell, behind) the hairpin bends and breaks of the lurching guitars, those vocals on songs like “More” or “Disappearing” or “Hey,” for example, are like a call from somewhere distant. Not a distress call from space necessarily, but a reassuring message (albeit with some urgency) from somewhere out there, whether in the cosmos or your own head. What better soundtrack for these times.


And if that is the sort of diversion you need, then HEY WHAT is worth a spin.



--

For more, follow The Putnam Post on Instagram and Twitter.

Two point oh

...or what is this supposed to be anyway?


--
For starters, this is the resurrection of a long-defunct piece of internet property left to gather dust somewhere deep in the woods off a lonely exit on an information super highway to nowhere. But to take our gaze off the rearview mirror and focus on the road ahead, it is a repurposing of this space with an eye toward talking about and sharing music. 

I like music. 

Granted, merely liking music does not necessarily qualify someone to write knowledgeably about it, and one more dude rambling on about it certainly doesn't fill any significant void out there. Plenty of people like music. Plenty of people do music criticism (or whatever you want to call it). But folks, music is a fucking firehose these days. On the supply side, the barriers to making it -- and especially sharing it -- are to some degree minimal (or comparatively minimal anyway). And on the demand side, man, it is all mostly right there at your finger tips. All of it. 

All of it. 

And that's a lot. That's a lot if your quest is, like mine, to find not only good music but challenging music as well. We're not lacking in either of those either. So in the end, one is faced with the task of finding and building trust in curators, curators who take that torrent of tunes and turn it into something more manageable.

So what, Putnam, you think you're one of those curators? Honestly, I don't know. Take a look to the right and see for yourself. If you're looking for examples of what I'm typically listening to, then the near-daily Musical interludes -- snippets of which you can find in our Instagram stories or full versions on our Twitter feed (or right here in the sidebar!) -- are right there for the taking. 

That series of musical interludes started as a distraction, a coping mechanism in the early covid days. Then, it was a series with the aim of cobbling together music with some tenuous link to the feelings and realities of the times. On the one hand, that produced songs like "Panic" by Annie Hamilton, but on the other, something like, The Temptations' "I Can't Get Next to You." But that wasn't really sustainable long term, and the mission morphed into something broader, something akin to the "playlists" I build across any given year on Spotify. Those are less playlists than they are a home for the music that crosses my path in the course of a year. Often, but not always, it is new music. But occasionally it is something older that has popped onto or back onto my radar in some meaningful way. 

And more or less, that is a microcosm for what I envision populating this space: part talk of music centered mainly on short form pieces (250 words or less) about new albums, EPs or singles that are worth a listen, part longer pieces (500 plus words) on past records that got me to where I am listening to the music that I listen to now and maybe throw in a dash of chatter about shows that come to town if the spirit moves me. 

Philosophically, I don't see much appetite out there for super long write ups on new stuff (and definitely at a time when most folks are gravitating to podcasts over the written word). If you are trying to be efficient about how you listen, then you want a keyword here or there to provide some clue about what you might be getting yourself into. If you're like me, you scroll through the new releases on Friday over coffee looking not for favorites -- there will always be some -- but for some nugget of information that makes you want to take a flyer on an album. Give me any small signal, any excuse to listen. That's part of what I'm trying to do here. 

So personally, although "-wave" is to music sub-genres what "-gate" is to political scandals, I'll usually fall prey to a -wave whether it is new or vapor or whatever. Nothing quite gets me on those Fridays like an album having the shoegaze moniker hung on it in a blurb. I'm almost as much of a sucker for that as am for cryptic social media messages from Autolux promising new material. [Yes, it is coming soon, but not as soon as you think. And for the record, Autolux only releases new albums in years when Republicans do well at the ballot box. True story. No, that isn't their intention.] 

That isn't an exhaustive list of keywords that I look for; just examples. While I gravitate toward music that falls under the broad banner of indie rock, my tastes are more eclectic than that. I'm not above spending an afternoon on the beach listening to Americana/country/bluegrass in honor of Merlefest. I like my rap wonky and envelope pushing like Shabazz Palaces. I'm quick to spin McCoy Tyner's "African Village," but can and do gamble on jazz picks. And the pandemic has pushed me more and more toward ambient stuff. [I don't know that I'd call that new Tim Hecker score, The North Water, ambient, but I don't know that I wouldn't either. Regardless, it is a solid escape.]

Ultimately, what I'm looking for and what I'm likely to share in this space is, well, grant me an aside of sorts in closing. 

Time-Life once, a long time ago, had a multi-part series on the history of rock 'n' roll. Boy did I eat that up. It was a nice but certainly not comprehensive chronological look at the evolution of rock music in the 20th century. David Bowie -- it's always Bowie! -- popped up periodically in interview segments from the episodes covering the 60s forward. But it was in the installment focusing on the in-studio production aesthetics of the 70s where he said something that both struck me and has stuck with me, serving as a kind of guiding light with respect to the sort of music I often find myself listening to, no, searching out. Talking about the introduction of synths to the music-making process Bowie said (and I'm paraphrasing here): 
We (he and Brian Eno because this was during the recording of the Berlin trilogy) had these things and they could bring all these interesting sounds into what we were doing. But we found ourselves breaking the machines down and escaping the presets. We were more interested in the snaps and farts they could produce.
And that's what this exercise is about to me: the snaps and farts in music. That is where the real fun is anyway. Those quirks that continuously push music forward. Here's to the snaps and farts! 


--

For more, follow The Putnam Post on Instagram and Twitter.